No description
jtricerolph
fcea24b46a
Key findings from diagnostic runs:
- timesheets/on/{date} returns only that DATE's shifts (not the whole
week), so weekly-step fetch only samples 6 days of a 30-day month
- user.report_department_id filter too strict: only 32 staff have it
set, missing many valid No 4 employees → £15k instead of £51k
- Correct approach: per-day fetch (all 30 days), dedup by shift.id
(robust against any duplicate timesheet records), filter by
shift.department_id → location_id (matches WF "by Location and Team")
Also includes inactive users (show_inactive=true) to catch staff who
left mid-month but still have timesheets in the date range.
Compare endpoint now shows baseCost (shift.cost) and oncostTotal
(shift.cost_with_oncosts) so we can confirm which matches WF's £51k.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| backend | ||
| frontend | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| seed-app.js | ||